Channel Surfer

This morning, surfing the channels, I'd found the movie  Nineteen Eighty-Four on. While the timing of the (re)airing of this film in relation to what our infallible government are doing didn't escape me, I'd taken particular note of one special point: What was the first commercial of the first commercial break of this? It was a promo by the Fox network for the "V" chip.

Did someone get a clue?

Oh, last night I'd caught part of a Santa Cruz public access program called "Voices". In this program, they were covering part of a documentary entitled Painful Deceptions. There were far too many points made for me to go into here (so go to Reopen 9-11 to get a dvd), but there are some things:

1. There wasn't enough fire -- or a great enough temperature of what fires there were -- in the towers hit by those planes to melt the structural supports. It appears that burning jet fuel can't reach temperatures to melt steel.

2. Explosives had to have been used to start the floors falling down upon themselves.

Insurance fraud? But wait....

In relation to the destruction of tower 7, it had fallen by way of implosion by, the property manager stated in an interview, a planned implosion due to so much fire in the building, the fire department couldn't contain it.

Interesting to note that the three angles taken of this building by video cameras at the time show very little fire.

What's more, FEMA, who was ordered to investigate the disaster, could come up with no explanation for the destruction of tower 7, in spite of the fact there was so little fire & the structure was built with steel beams far more massive than any other building in the world. The beams having been used because of the fact the building straddled the large complex of subway & other train tunnels.

While alluded to only by the presenter of the documentary, as well as by a man I'd met not long ago in Hawaii, how is it that if the Pentagon had been hit by one of the hijacked planes, there's no news footage of a plane in the gaping (supposedly only bus-sized) hole in the side of the structure?

At the very least, there really are so many questions surrounding the 9/11 issue, that an independent inquiry is obviously in order. Naturally, those truly responsible for the "attack" would never be held accountable, but, I think today more than ever that "the truth shall set you (us) free".

Is it any wonder I want to be Canadian?